Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite the proven benefit of statins, many patients fail to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. Contributing factors include poor adherence, statin intolerance, and high baseline LDL-C levels. This gap leaves patients vulnerable to residual cardiovascular risk—driven not only by LDL-C but also by other atherogenic lipoproteins, including non-HDL-C, apoB, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, and Lp(a).
Mechanistic insights underscore LDL-C’s central role in atherosclerosis and plaque vulnerability. The PCSK9 pathway regulates LDL receptor recycling, directly influencing LDL-C levels. Inhibiting this pathway—through currently available therapeutic strategies—has been associated with enhanced LDL clearance. Imaging studies link intensive LDL-C reduction to plaque stabilization and regression. These findings support the potential benefit of earlier, more profound LDL-C lowering in high-risk populations.
Recent guideline revisions advocate for lower LDL-C thresholds and emphasize identifying patients who may benefit from more intensive lipid-lowering approaches. Systematic risk assessment, EHR tools, and shared decision-making may help clinicians address barriers to care. Multidisciplinary collaboration remains key in optimizing adherence, education, and access.
How can healthcare professionals better identify and manage ASCVD patients with high residual cardiovascular risk despite statin therapy? What changes to clinical workflows or patient engagement strategies could support timely and intensive LDL-C management?
The changes for workflow are more about easy access to those secondary treatments to get the LDL down. New indication for things like we path up for primary prevention makes that easier, but also easy access to things like the Zetia. Etc. also having EMR reminders for LDL goal
• Medication review:
• Current medications are reviewed to ensure adherence, tolerance, and appropriate dosing.
• Goals of therapy are discussed with the patient, emphasizing the importance of LDL-C lowering in secondary prevention.
• Laboratory follow-up:
• A fasting lipid profile is repeated 6–8 weeks after medication adjustment or initiation to assess therapeutic response.
• Treatment adjustment:
• If LDL-C remains >55 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin therapy,
→ Ezetimibe should be added.
• If statins are not tolerated,
→ consider alternative therapies such as ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors.
• Dose titration and combination therapy are individualized based on tolerance, risk level, and LDL-C goals.
• Patient counseling:
• Reinforce adherence, lifestyle modification, and regular follow-up for optimal secondary prevention outcomes.